Spending the bulk of my time on drafting harmonization guidance, I didn’t
fully enjoy the Norwegian International Development Minister’s speech to the
Chief Executives Board on the UN agencies’ indifference towards UN reform.
Especially so as information was leaking that Norway was going to cut Regular
Resources to UNICEF because of a perceived lack of our cooperation in the
effort.
But now, I am relieved. Because, on second thoughts, such statements show that
donors might be no less bamboozled than we are about the direction of UN reform.
Why do Norwegians cut our RR, while the like-minded Swedes gave us an increase?
And as one of the most vocal agencies on the issue, does Norway want us to hand
over their funds for the African Girls Education Initiative to government as
Direct Budget Support?
It clearly doesn’t make sense to add comparatively minuscule amounts into large
pools of money and Budget Support. But if Norway wants us to safeguard the
normative basis, ensure attention to Human Rights Conventions, and add
quality to collaborative efforts – something we have been struggling to do
for years - then they need to finance a highly authoritative cadre of technical
advisors and policy specialists. We cannot pool-away all our resources and have
an influential presence at the same time.
And this means financing Regular Resources.
(11 November 2004)